One interesting thing thats come up in discussion and sales is size! Not in regards to a persons penis but vibrators/dildos/"massagers"
First its good to point out heaps of people have the mindset if you pay more money there should be a large quanity or amount of whatever it is. This is in general, i think. Then there are some folks who will pay more for better quality, long lasting whatever it is. I totally get both points. In an adult shop though, you get what you pay for IMO.
Now to shift to the saucy side of things! We know theres a myth about size for men. Bigger is better for women (or other men but I feel in most spaces this exists in a heteronormative discussion, lesbians dont tend to have this ideal and most gay men don't subscribe to this myth because it is about dominating women and thinking women get off on penetration as opposed to clitoral stimulation. Kk?)
This myth has spread further than I imagined. People leak this into toys. Men take a look at the higher quality, longer lasting, nicer feeling, best warrantied, and ironically, one of the only lines designed by women, luxury toys and say either "shit, I could please a girl better than THAT, I'm way bigger than that thing!" Or "Who the hell would pay for that? No woman would enjoy that, especially for 150-250 bucks!"
...
It's even gotten into womens heads they need something huge and elephant-like to get 1)pleasure and 2) their moneys worth.
Dont get me wrong. Some women really enjoy that. But its wrong to assume, (especially for vanilla folks, or women who want to get in tune with what pleases them), to reach awesome orgasms that it requires a double fist. Or is anything far from a lelo/swan. Its wrong to assume orgasms can only or should come from penetration. Why is this wrong? Because its not true and stems from male dominated fields full of sexist ideals that dont have a voice or space for women.
No comments:
Post a Comment